0 Contact

Adopt Lean Portfolio Management

scroll-arrow
scroll

Organisations that implement SAFe at team and ART level without changing the portfolio layer tend to hit the same ceiling. Funding stays annual. Governance stays project-based. Strategy doesn't reach the teams doing the work. The ARTs run PI Planning, but the decisions that matter — what to fund, what to stop, how to respond to change — still happen the same way they always did.

Lean Portfolio Management is where that changes. It's also where implementations most commonly stall, because the people who need to change their behaviour are senior leaders, and changing leadership behaviour requires more than training.

Em Campbell-Pretty and Adrienne Wilson are SAFe Fellows, SPCTs, and the authors of The ART of Avoiding a Train Wreck — the book on what goes wrong in SAFe implementations and how to prevent it. That pattern recognition is what they bring to every LPM engagement.

Led by SAFe Fellows who are also SPCTs.

LPM Adoption Roadmap

SAFe LPM Adoption Roadmap

Who this is for

Where you're starting from shapes the sequence.

Organisations starting with LPM often have significant portfolio complexity — multiple value streams, competing priorities, and funding governance that needs to change before team-level agility can take hold. Starting at the portfolio is the right call when leadership alignment and strategic clarity are the primary constraints. This is typically the most complex entry point, because there are no existing SAFe practices to build on.

Organisations extending an existing SAFe implementation to the portfolio level have one or more ARTs running well and need to connect them to a coherent portfolio governance model. The challenge here is translating what's working at the ART level into portfolio practices that senior leaders will actually use — and sustain after the initial engagement.

Organisations implementing LPM as a standalone capability — without a broader SAFe implementation — are often PMOs or VMOs shifting from project-based funding to flow-based governance. The training and workshop sequence is the same; the consulting support is shaped to that specific context.

What a typical LPM engagement involves

Every organisation takes its own path. A typical engagement draws from the following, sequenced to your context:

Training

  • SAFe Lean Portfolio Management — 2-day certified course plus a 1-day Getting Started with LPM Workshop, delivered as a 3-day package. The course covers portfolio strategy and investment funding, Agile portfolio operations, and Lean governance, and leads to the LPM certification exam. The Getting Started workshop co-creates the LPM adoption plan and prepares your team for the kick-off event.
  • Leading SAFe is a recommended prerequisite for LPM training.

Workshops

  • LPM Kick-Off Event — Engages portfolio decision-makers and value stream leaders at the start of the journey. Outputs include LPM participants and responsibilities, event design and cadence, and a tailored implementation plan.
  • Design Portfolio Kanban Workshop — 1-day. Defines the initial Portfolio Kanban states, exit criteria, and WIP limits. Includes a tooling workshop to operationalise the system.
  • LPM Assessment — Examines the portfolio's current use of flow-based practices. Facilitated as a collaborative workshop. Establishes a baseline and roadmap for improvement.

Consulting support

The consulting work that follows training and initial workshops is where the implementation either holds or doesn't. A typical first phase includes:

Establishing portfolio governance

  • LPM Kick-Off Event facilitation
  • Portfolio Kanban design and operationalisation
  • Portfolio Sync and Strategic Portfolio Review establishment

Building portfolio capability

  • Empathy interviews and event design preparation
  • Participatory Budgeting facilitation
  • LPM Community of Practice establishment

Measuring and sustaining

  • LPM Assessment facilitation
  • Portfolio metrics identification and implementation
  • Coaching through the first phase of LPM adoption

The sequence matters as much as the content. Pretty Agile will work with your leadership team to determine the right scope and order for your context — including the leadership alignment work that typically determines whether LPM holds after kick-off.

Why it matters who runs the LPM implementation

Connecting portfolio strategy to team execution is harder than it looks. The funding model, the governance cadences, the way epics are written and prioritised — these are all leadership behaviours, and changing them requires more than training.

Pretty Agile has been implementing SAFe in Australian enterprises since 2014. The patterns that predict a difficult LPM implementation — and the interventions that address them — come from that experience.

  • SAFe Fellows who are also SPCTs
  • Authors of Tribal Unity and The ART of Avoiding a Train Wreck
  • Australia's most experienced Scaled Agile Partner
  • Trained 14,500+ people in SAFe since 2014
  • Scaled Agile Platinum SPCT Partner
  • 100% Australian owned and operated

Ready to implement LPM?

Most LPM implementations that stall do so in the first three months after kick-off, when the governance cadences are in place but the leadership behaviours haven't changed. Talk to us about where you are, what's driving the need for LPM, and what leadership alignment looks like in your organisation. We'll help you plan the right sequence and scope — and identify early whether training alone is likely to be enough.

Get in touch

Frequently asked questions

The training gives the right people a shared model and language. Implementation is the work of changing how the portfolio actually operates — the funding conversations, the governance cadences, the Kanban system, the connection between strategy and PI objectives. Most organisations that do the training without the implementation support find that the concepts make sense but the behaviours don't change. The training is the foundation; the consulting is where the change happens.

Lean Portfolio Management changes three things: how work is funded (from annual project budgets to lean budget guardrails allocated to value streams), how strategic decisions are made (from centralised approval to participatory budgeting and Portfolio Kanban), and how strategy connects to execution (through portfolio epics that flow to ART backlogs). The governance cadences — Portfolio Sync and Strategic Portfolio Review — replace traditional steering committees and project status reporting. In practice, the change is visible in leadership behaviour: who is in the room for prioritisation decisions, how funding is adjusted mid-year, and whether teams have the context they need to make good local decisions.

No — but the sequencing decision matters. Organisations with no ARTs running yet often benefit from starting LPM work in parallel with ART launch preparation, particularly the value stream identification and budget guardrails work. Organisations with ARTs already running are typically ready to focus directly on portfolio governance. Pretty Agile will assess the right sequence at the start of the engagement.

The initial phase — training, Getting Started Workshop, Kick-Off Event, and Portfolio Kanban design — typically runs eight to twelve weeks. The consulting support that follows depends on how much the organisation needs to change its governance model and how ready leadership is to operate differently. Organisations that treat the kick-off as the finish line tend to revert. The first three to six months after kick-off are where the implementation either holds or doesn't.

The people who need to change their behaviour are the ones who need to be in the room. That typically means VMO/PMO leadership, Business Owners, Portfolio Executives, and the RTEs and Product Managers whose work connects to portfolio decisions. Getting the right people — particularly those with authority over funding and prioritisation — into the training and workshops is usually the most important sequencing decision in the whole engagement.